Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
non-economic_damages [2025/08/14 20:53] – created xiaoer | non-economic_damages [2025/08/14 20:56] (current) – removed xiaoer | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== Non-Economic Damages: The Ultimate Guide to Compensation for Pain and Suffering ====== | + | |
- | **LEGAL DISCLAIMER: | + | |
- | ===== What are Non-Economic Damages? A 30-Second Summary ===== | + | |
- | Imagine a careless driver runs a red light and smashes into your car. The aftermath is a whirlwind of invoices: the tow truck, the emergency room, the physical therapist, the car repair shop. These bills have clear, specific dollar amounts. They are tangible, calculable, and are known in the legal world as `[[economic_damages]]`. But what about the things you can't put a price tag on? The searing back pain that keeps you up at night? The panic attack you have every time you get behind the wheel? The heartbreaking reality that you can no longer pick up your grandchild or go for your morning run? | + | |
- | This is the world of non-economic damages. They are the law's attempt to answer an almost impossible question: "What is a person' | + | |
- | * **Key Takeaways At-a-Glance: | + | |
- | * | + | |
- | * | + | |
- | * | + | |
- | ===== Part 1: The Legal Foundations of Non-Economic Damages ===== | + | |
- | ==== The Story of Non-Economic Damages: A Historical Journey ==== | + | |
- | The idea that a person should be compensated for more than just their out-of-pocket expenses is deeply rooted in `[[common_law]]`. Centuries ago, English courts recognized that an injury from a `[[tort]]` (a civil wrong) inflicted harms beyond just a doctor' | + | |
- | Throughout the 19th and 20th centuries, as industrialization led to more workplace and traffic accidents, the concept of non-economic damages solidified in U.S. courts. Juries were entrusted with the solemn duty of evaluating a plaintiff' | + | |
- | However, the 1980s and 1990s saw the rise of the **" | + | |
- | ==== The Law on the Books: Statutes and Codes ==== | + | |
- | Unlike a specific crime defined in a penal code, non-economic damages are a concept defined primarily by state-level civil statutes and decades of court decisions (case law). There is no single federal law that governs them for all cases. | + | |
- | Instead, each state has its own civil code and legal precedents that outline what constitutes non-economic damages and, crucially, whether there are any limits. For example, the **Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, Chapter 74**, explicitly places a hard cap on non-economic damages in healthcare liability claims. The statute states: | + | |
- | > "In a wrongful death or survival action on a health care liability claim, the limit on non-economic damages for all | + |